Conclusion: This article was not peer reviewed in any meaningful way.) It would have benefited greatly from actual peer review. (How do we know it was a predatory journal? It was published a week and a half after being submitted, which is absurd the author paid $100 for the article to be published and, crucially, all of the issues I'm about to mention would have been picked up by even the most rudimentary of peer reviewers. This is an interesting article, but is harmed by being published in a predatory journal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |